Stand up for REAL science. Critically analyze ALL theories.
Teach the ACTUAL Controversies.
Critically Analyze ALL Theories.
BLOG
REAL Science Blog

REAL Science Home

Contact Webmaster

Link to This Website

RSS Feed


Read this FREE online!


Our YouTube Channel


Saturday, December 8, 2007
The Importance of Theories

Theories are crucial to science because they provide a coherent framework for making sense out of scientific observations.

An example of such a theory is the theory of evolution. Without the theoretical framework of evolution, biologists would be limited to observing living things and noting the similarities and differences between them.

The following story illustrates the importance of theories in science.


One notable difference between organisms is seen in the chromosome numbers of the members of the family Hominidae, including humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans.

Here is a detailed, yet incomplete, history of scientific discoveries concerning human and great ape chromosome numbers:

1958: Researchers definitively confirmed that humans have 46 chromosomes.

1960: Researchers determined that the chimpanzee chromosome number is 48.

1961: Researchers determined that the gorilla chromosome number is 48.

1961: Researchers determined that the orangutan chromosome is 48.

1975: Researchers used various techniques to compare orangutan chromosomes with the chromosomes of humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas. Their analysis confirmed the hypothesis that the four species derived from a common ancestor.

1980: Researchers noted the striking resemblance of the chromosomes of humans and chimpanzees.

1982: Researchers reported that the striking chromosomal similarities extend to orangutans and gorillas as well. They also noted that a specific pattern in the middle of human chromosome 2 bore a resemblance to the ends (telomeres) of two separate chromosomes in the great apes. Using evolutionary theory, the researchers hypothesized that human chromosome 2 resulted from the fusion of two separate chromosomes that would have been present in the common ancestor of humans and the other great apes.

1991: Researchers tested the chromosome fusion hypothesis by sequencing the previously discovered telomere region in the middle of human chromosome 2. What they found were stretches of DNA that are normally found in telomeres. This discovery confirmed the fusion hypothesis.

1992: Researchers detected evidence of a deactivated centromere sequence in human chromosome 2. Centromeres are regions normally found in the middle of chromosomes. The second centromere sequence was located right where it was expected to be found, based on the already identified corresponding chromosome in chimpanzees. This discovery also confirmed the fusion hypothesis.

2002: Researchers mapped the precise fusion point on human chromosome 2 and described its structure in detail.

2005: Researchers mapped the precise location of the deactivated centromere on human chromosome 2 and described its structure in detail.

2005: Researchers published the initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome, showing a break in alignment continuity at precisely the locations predicted by the fusion hypothesis.

As can be seen in the list above, it literally took decades to uncover the explanation for the difference in human and great ape chromosome numbers.

It is important to note that, since they had a theoretical framework to work from, the scientists responsible for these discoveries were not limited to simply noting the similarities and differences in the chromosomes. They could actually discover the causes of those similarities and differences.

It is also important to note that scientists did not just run across this evidence and then later claim that it supported the common ancestry of humans and great apes. Instead, they used evolutionary theory to propose a testable hypothesis, to form predictions based on that hypothesis, to test those predictions by examining the chromosomes, and to ultimately confirm their hypothesis.

Theories: you can't do science without them.

For more on this topic, see the video clip below from Nova's Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial.





posted by Jeremy Mohn

|


Stumble Upon Toolbar
Stumble It!

<< Home | Exam Results Show Need for National Standards >> | Introducing the "stand up for REAL science" Blog >>


Archives
December 2007  
January 2008  
February 2008  
March 2008  
April 2008  
May 2008  
June 2008  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Blog Contributors

What is REAL science?



Disclaimer:
The thoughts and opinions expressed on this blog are solely our own. They do not necessarily represent the views of our employers or any other organization with which we are affiliated.

Comment Policy:
One of the goals of this website is to foster constructive dialogue concerning science and science education. Comments not in line with this goal may be deleted.

Our Visitors:
Scientific criticism originates within the scientific literature, not outside of it.
© Jeremy Mohn, 2006