Stand up for REAL science. Critically analyze ALL theories.
Teach the ACTUAL Controversies.
Critically Analyze ALL Theories.
BLOG
REAL Science Blog

REAL Science Home

Contact Webmaster

Link to This Website

RSS Feed


Read this FREE online!


Our YouTube Channel



Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Evolution Crosses Finish Line...But Who Won?

This morning, the Florida State Board of Education voted 4-3 in favor of adopting science teaching standards (pdf) that include the word "evolution" for the first time.

However, the Board also approved a last-minute "compromise" to insert the phrase "scientific theory of" in front of evolution and other scientific explanations, including plate tectonics, gravity, and electromagnetism.

Thankfully, the standards thorougly explain the meaning of the word "theory" in science and describe how it differs from the word's everyday usage. Here are a few snippets from various grade level standards:

3rd Grade:
-The terms that describe examples of scientific knowledge, for example; "theory," "law," "hypothesis" and "model" have very specific meanings and functions within science.

6th grade:
-Recognize and explain that a scientific theory is a well-supported and widely accepted explanation of nature and is not simply a claim posed by an individual. Thus, the use of the term theory in science is very different than how it is used in everyday life.
-Identify that a scientific theory is an explanation of nature supported by evidence.

9th-12th grade:
-Explain that a scientific theory is the culmination of many scientific investigations drawing together all the current evidence concerning a substantial range of phenomena; thus, a scientific theory represents the most powerful explanation scientists have to offer.
-Recognize that a scientific theory is developed by repeated investigations of many scientists and agreement on the likely explanation.

The lasting effect of the change remains to be seen, but I am optimistic that the so-called "compromise" could turn out to be a resounding victory for supporters of REAL science.

As I noted in an earlier post, in their misguided attempts to denigrate evolution by calling it a "theory," the opponents of evolution have actually assigned to it a level of significance that few other scientific ideas ever achieve.

Ironically, this is like arguing that an Olympian should be disqualified for the offense of finishing in first place.

So go ahead Florida, teach evolution as a well-substantiated, well-supported, and well-documented explanation.

We appreciate your support for REAL science.

Just don't expect to get the gold medal back.

Although I remain optimistic, I can't help but worry that the "gold medal" that Florida just awarded to evolution may actually be made out of lead.

Consider the following headline from Reuters:

"Florida will teach evolution but only as theory"

Clearly, supporters of REAL science may have won this leg of the race, but we have a long way to go.



posted by Jeremy Mohn

|


<< Home | Florida BoE Set to Vote Tomorrow >> | Still Standing . . . (One Year And Counting) >> | Apples and Oranges >> | ScienceDebate2008 Has a Date >> | Summary Article About Florida Hearings >> | Dover Isn't Over: Is Florida Next? >> | Evolution Sunday: Layers of Significance >> | Outstanding Editorial From Minnesota >> | Texas Academy of Science Weighs In >> | Evolution Wins Gold Medal in Sunshine State >>


Archives
December 2007  
January 2008  
February 2008  
March 2008  
April 2008  
May 2008  
June 2008  
July 2008  
August 2008  
September 2008  
October 2008  
November 2008  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Blog Contributors

What is REAL science?



Disclaimer:
The thoughts and opinions expressed on this blog are solely our own. They do not necessarily represent the views of our employers or any other organization with which we are affiliated.

Comment Policy:
One of the goals of this website is to foster constructive dialogue concerning science and science education. Comments not in line with this goal may be deleted.

Our Visitors:


Scientific criticism originates within the scientific literature, not outside of it.
© Jeremy Mohn, 2006