Stand up for REAL science. Critically analyze ALL theories.
Teach the ACTUAL Controversies.
Critically Analyze ALL Theories.
BLOG

Attention: The URL for this blog has changed.
It can now be found here: http://www.anevolvingcreation.net/standup/
REAL Science Blog

REAL Science Home

Contact Webmaster

Link to This Website

RSS Feed


Our YouTube Channel


Read this FREE online!




Friday, April 4, 2008
Florida Bills Are "Needless and Treacherous"

Florida Citizens for Science has issued a press release concerning the "evolution academic freedom act" that will be considered by the Florida Senate's Judiciary Committee this Tuesday.

The bill was approved last month by a 4-1 vote in the Pre-K-12 Education committee.

According to the FlCfS press release, the bill is both "needless and treacherous."

Why is it needless?

The bills serve no secular, academic purpose. Freedom of academic inquiry is already provided for in the new state science standards, approved by the Florida Board of Education in February. The Pre-K-12 committee's own bill analysis, prepared in advance of the meeting, clearly highlighted this fact. The bill proponents' call for "academic freedom" is a political ploy that attempts to paint anyone in opposition to it as un-American and against education. Academic freedom, as commonly used and understood, does not apply to the public school classroom, but rather applies to university level research. Students in high school are certainly not doing cutting-edge research. Instead, they're learning what real researchers have discovered so that one day these students can then explore their own new frontiers.

Why is it treacherous?

These bills, if approved, will eventually invite expensive lawsuits during a time when our state is in a financial crisis. An ACLU representative who spoke at the Pre-K-12 committee's meeting warned the legislators about this. Ignoring such a warning is irresponsible and does not serve the public's or Florida students' best interests. Sen. Ronda Storms, who introduced the Senate bill, is quoted in the St. Petersburg Times on March 11: "Under this bill, if you have a teacher who is pro-evolution and every student is intelligent design...that teacher is safe to teach that as a theory."

One obvious clue that the promoters of this bill are not really concerned with "academic freedom" is the simple fact that they single out evolution. No other scientific theories are receiving this degree of special treatment. Such blatant selective criticism reveals an underlying concern about evolution in particular, not a genuine concern for scientific accuracy or academic freedom.

This bill is clearly a "Dover Trap" designed to encourage teachers in local school districts to teach antievolution arguments in the name of "academic freedom." It's a pity that some unassuming local school district is likely to get caught with the legal bill if this leads to a court case.



posted by Jeremy Mohn



<< Home | Judgment Day Wins Peabody Award >> | Ken Miller live, 7 pm Friday >> | Just Another Deceptive Distraction >> | Battle Against Teaching Evolution in Texas Begins >> | My Favorite Time of Year >> | Layers of Understanding >> | Academic Freedom and Dogs >> | Lawrence Krauss on Scientific Literacy >> | OOPSIEs >> | Clarifying Texas >>


Archives
December 2007  
January 2008  
February 2008  
March 2008  
April 2008  
May 2008  
June 2008  
July 2008  
August 2008  
September 2008  
October 2008  
November 2008  
December 2008  
January 2009  
February 2009  
March 2009  
April 2009  
May 2009  
June 2009  
July 2009  
August 2009  
September 2009  
October 2009  
November 2009  
December 2009  
January 2010  
February 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Blog Contributors

What is REAL science?




Disclaimer:
The thoughts and opinions expressed on this blog are solely our own. They do not necessarily represent the views of our employers or any other organization with which we are affiliated.

Comment Policy:
One of the goals of this website is to foster constructive dialogue concerning science and science education. Comments not in line with this goal may be deleted.

Our Visitors:

Scientific criticism originates within the scientific literature, not outside of it.
© Jeremy Mohn, 2006