Stand up for REAL science. Critically analyze ALL theories.
Teach the ACTUAL Controversies.
Critically Analyze ALL Theories.
BLOG

Attention: The URL for this blog has changed.
It can now be found here: http://www.anevolvingcreation.net/standup/
REAL Science Blog

REAL Science Home

Contact Webmaster

Link to This Website

RSS Feed


Our YouTube Channel


Read this FREE online!




Friday, July 11, 2008
REAL Science: Evolution of Flatfish

National Geographic's headline reads "Odd Fish Find Contradicts Intelligent-Design Argument." That's because evolutionary theory predicted these existence of these transitional flatfish, whereas intelligent design simply postulates "God did it" and stops asking questions.

The discovery of a missing link in the evolution of bizarre flatfishes-each of which has both eyes on the same side of its head-could give intelligent design advocates a sinking feeling.

CT scans of 50-million-year-old fossils have revealed an intermediate species between primitive flatfishes (with eyes on both sides of their heads) and the modern, lopsided versions, which include sole, flounder, and halibut.

So the change happened gradually, in a way consistent with evolution via natural selection-not suddenly, as researchers once had little choice but to believe, the authors of the new study say.

The article also describes the process of science, the sheer hard work that research requires, and the creationists' predictable response - "Fish have always been fish" - made without having done any such work themselves. REAL scientists understand the importance of asking questions and doing the hard work to find the answers.



posted by Cheryl Shepherd-Adams



<< Home | Map Change >> | Candidates show their colors >> | Defusing the Religion Issue . . . Again >> | How REAL science gets done >> | America's Founding Creationists? Not. Hardly. >> | Showdown in Texas: Christina Comer Sues the TEA >> | On Freedoms >> | A North American Field Guide: Identifying Anti-evo... >> | Popular does not mean correct >> | Brandon Kenig Responds >>


Archives
December 2007  
January 2008  
February 2008  
March 2008  
April 2008  
May 2008  
June 2008  
July 2008  
August 2008  
September 2008  
October 2008  
November 2008  
December 2008  
January 2009  
February 2009  
March 2009  
April 2009  
May 2009  
June 2009  
July 2009  
August 2009  
September 2009  
October 2009  
November 2009  
December 2009  
January 2010  
February 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Blog Contributors

What is REAL science?




Disclaimer:
The thoughts and opinions expressed on this blog are solely our own. They do not necessarily represent the views of our employers or any other organization with which we are affiliated.

Comment Policy:
One of the goals of this website is to foster constructive dialogue concerning science and science education. Comments not in line with this goal may be deleted.

Our Visitors:

Scientific criticism originates within the scientific literature, not outside of it.
© Jeremy Mohn, 2006