Stand up for REAL science. Critically analyze ALL theories.
Teach the ACTUAL Controversies.
Critically Analyze ALL Theories.
BLOG

Attention: The URL for this blog has changed.
It can now be found here: http://www.anevolvingcreation.net/standup/
REAL Science Blog

REAL Science Home

Contact Webmaster

Link to This Website

RSS Feed


Our YouTube Channel


Read this FREE online!




Wednesday, September 10, 2008
. . . we're still heeere . . .



The world didn't end when the Large Hadron Collider was switched on in CERN in the wee morning hours today. From one of the project scientists, Brian Cox, on the irrational fears:

I am in fact immensely irritated by the conspiracy theorists who spread this nonsense around and try to scare people. This non-story is symptomatic of a larger mistrust in science, particularly in the US, which includes intelligent design amongst other things.

The only serious issue is why so many people who don't have the time or inclination to discover for themselves why this stuff is total crap have to be exposed to the opinions of these half-wits.


More on Cox:

Among the white coats is Manchester University professor Brian Cox, whose credentials as a figure in a Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy-style turn of events couldn't be more certain.

Before embarking on his scientific career, Cox was a keyboard player with the chart-topping band D:Ream, best known for the hit single and Labour Party anthem Things Can Only Get better.

By the time the band split in 1997, Brian was Dr Brian, having gained a first class honours degree in physics from Manchester University and a PhD in high energy particle physics in Hamburg.

He now splits his time between Manchester and a laboratory in Geneva, where he is in charge of the international project which created the ATLAS detectors, which allow scientists to assess what is happening inside the LHC.

He has little time for people who think the world is going to end as a result of the LHC experiment, even using some pretty non-scientific language to describe the meddling menaces who have planted 'end is nigh' theories in normally sane heads.

"I don't think anything bad of the housewife in Macclesfield who has listened to all this nonsense and thinks that something terrible might happen," the surprisingly down-to-earth particle physicist says, speaking a few days before switch-on.

"But those conspiracy theorists, the one or two scientists who disagree with absolutely every other scientist in the world about the risks involved, and who have started this silly debate unnecessarily, they really are t****.

"The point is, it's not ridiculous for people to be concerned about new scientific discoveries, including GM crops and genetic engineering, with some level of trepidation.

"But when it comes to the LHC, every single scientist in the world who knows anything about it, says that there's no problem.

"These idiots have caused us problems and cost us money. By threatening to blow the place up, they've forced us to hire loads of extra security.

"In fact, if one of these particles were to hit you, you wouldn't feel it. It would do you less harm than a mosquito bite."



posted by Cheryl Shepherd-Adams



<< Home | NCSE Welcomes Steve #899 >> | Kim Houtz - A Stand Up Gal >> | Properly Categorized >> | Paul Cottle - A Stand Up Guy >> | So Complex, It Had to Have Evolved >> | Large (real) Hadrons, Large (unreal) Fears >> | Do you care about apathy? >> | Adam Savage on Teaching Science >> | When "Yes" or "No" is too difficult . . . >> | David Campbell - A Stand Up Guy >>


Archives
December 2007  
January 2008  
February 2008  
March 2008  
April 2008  
May 2008  
June 2008  
July 2008  
August 2008  
September 2008  
October 2008  
November 2008  
December 2008  
January 2009  
February 2009  
March 2009  
April 2009  
May 2009  
June 2009  
July 2009  
August 2009  
September 2009  
October 2009  
November 2009  
December 2009  
January 2010  
February 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Blog Contributors

What is REAL science?




Disclaimer:
The thoughts and opinions expressed on this blog are solely our own. They do not necessarily represent the views of our employers or any other organization with which we are affiliated.

Comment Policy:
One of the goals of this website is to foster constructive dialogue concerning science and science education. Comments not in line with this goal may be deleted.

Our Visitors:

Scientific criticism originates within the scientific literature, not outside of it.
© Jeremy Mohn, 2006