Stand up for REAL science. Critically analyze ALL theories.
Teach the ACTUAL Controversies.
Critically Analyze ALL Theories.
BLOG

Attention: The URL for this blog has changed.
It can now be found here: http://www.anevolvingcreation.net/standup/
REAL Science Blog

REAL Science Home

Contact Webmaster

Link to This Website

RSS Feed


Our YouTube Channel


Read this FREE online!




Sunday, October 26, 2008
One More Response to the KCFS Questionnaire

Paul Casanova is the Democratic candidate for the District 10 seat of the Kansas Board of Education. When we posted the responses to the KCFS questionnaire earlier, Casanova's answers were not yet available.

Well, here they are:

1. As a State Board of Education member, which of the following organizations would you trust to inform your decision-making in regards to science? Check all that apply.

a. Amer. Assoc. for the Advancement of Science _X_
b. The Intelligent Design Network ___
c. The National Academies of Science _X_
d. The Discovery Institute ___
e. The American Institute of Biological Sciences _X_
f. Answers in Genesis ___
g. The National Science Teachers Association _X_
h. The Institute for Creation Research ___

Other organizations you trust in the area of science: (Please name)

2. Would you, if elected, propose revising the science standards before the next regularly scheduled revision, or support such a revision if another board member proposed it?

No, there has been so much change in this area already that I feel the system has suffered.

3. Do you support an age-appropriate, medically-accurate, comprehensive approach (often referred to as abstinence plus) to sexual education for the students of Kansas?

Yes. I also feel though that if a parent wants their child to opt out, that the parent should have that choice.

4. Do you think it is appropriate for individual state board members to write state curricular standards instead of relying on the board's own appointed committees of professionals from each curricular field?

I think as a board member we should have the final say in all curricular standards. In saying that, I certainly do believe that the appointed committees should be the ones to write the standards.

5. Do you have any other comments about science education you would wish to share with the voters of Kansas?

I think that it is important that our science standards should meet that of the nation. If our children are going to be competitive in the 21st century they must have the academic skills to do so. I am committed to ensuring that our children can compete globally and making Kansas a leader in education.



posted by Jeremy Mohn



<< Home | Feynman and the Train >> | Governor Palin Swats At Fruit Fly Research >> | Expelled, Egnor, and Evolution >> | The Latest "A Vote For Science" Video >> | The Economic Effect of Anti-Evolutionism in Texas >> | Science, Sex, and the Kansas State Board of Educat... >> | Question #5: What else do you have to say? >> | Question #4: How arrogant are you? >> | Question #3: Sex Ed >> | Question #2: Changing the science standards - whe... >>


Archives
December 2007  
January 2008  
February 2008  
March 2008  
April 2008  
May 2008  
June 2008  
July 2008  
August 2008  
September 2008  
October 2008  
November 2008  
December 2008  
January 2009  
February 2009  
March 2009  
April 2009  
May 2009  
June 2009  
July 2009  
August 2009  
September 2009  
October 2009  
November 2009  
December 2009  
January 2010  
February 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Blog Contributors

What is REAL science?




Disclaimer:
The thoughts and opinions expressed on this blog are solely our own. They do not necessarily represent the views of our employers or any other organization with which we are affiliated.

Comment Policy:
One of the goals of this website is to foster constructive dialogue concerning science and science education. Comments not in line with this goal may be deleted.

Our Visitors:

Scientific criticism originates within the scientific literature, not outside of it.
© Jeremy Mohn, 2006