Stand up for REAL science. Critically analyze ALL theories.
Teach the ACTUAL Controversies.
Critically Analyze ALL Theories.

Attention: The URL for this blog has changed.
It can now be found here:
REAL Science Blog

REAL Science Home

Contact Webmaster

Link to This Website

RSS Feed

Our YouTube Channel

Read this FREE online!

Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Interview with Judge John E. Jones, III

Image from PLoS

I just ran across this interview with Honorable Judge John E. Jones, III in PLoS Genetics.

Ever since the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial, Judge Jones has taken on a sort of "rockstar" status among science geeks like me, so I couldn't resist reading more of his thoughts concerning the trial. I encourage you to check out the interview for yourself.

Here's a brief excerpt (the interviewer's name is Jane Gitschier):

Gitschier: Did [Ken] Miller talk about molecular evolution, DNA sequences, etc.?

Jones: To the extent that he needed to.

Gitschier: Because the evidence is amazing.

Jones: It is stunning when you get into it. Broadly, as the trial progressed, what was remarkable to me, as you go back-you well know this in your field-people called it Darwin's theory of evolution. Here's Charles Darwin, who had not the benefit at all of genetics, and yet from my view, almost every subsequent discovery tends to bear out Darwin's theory and has only made it stronger, including the field of genetics. But Ken Miller went into the immune system, the blood clotting cascade, and the bacterial flagellum-all three are held out by intelligent design proponents as irreducibly complex, and in effect, having no precursors. He [Miller] knocked that down, I thought, quite effectively-so comprehensively and so well. By the time Miller was done testifying, over the span of a couple of days, the defendants were really already in the hole.

But I can't decide the case until I hear all the evidence, and I didn't.

For me, this was the most intriguing part of the interview because it illustrates how a patient, effective presentation of the evidence of evolution can truly persuade an objective observer.

We need more of that.

posted by Jeremy Mohn

<< Home | Evolution Education and Outreach >> | Intelligent Design: a lo$ing proposition >> | Evolution is REAL Science #3 >> | Roger Ebert Reviews Expelled >> | That Which We Call a Lie >> | Cdesign Proponentsists, The Sequel >> | KAMS funding in jeopardy >> | Dr. Neil Shubin: Capturing the Imagination >> | REAL Academic Freedom >> | Judge John E. Jones III: Keeping it REAL >>

December 2007  
January 2008  
February 2008  
March 2008  
April 2008  
May 2008  
June 2008  
July 2008  
August 2008  
September 2008  
October 2008  
November 2008  
December 2008  
January 2009  
February 2009  
March 2009  
April 2009  
May 2009  
June 2009  
July 2009  
August 2009  
September 2009  
October 2009  
November 2009  
December 2009  
January 2010  
February 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Blog Contributors

What is REAL science?

The thoughts and opinions expressed on this blog are solely our own. They do not necessarily represent the views of our employers or any other organization with which we are affiliated.

Comment Policy:
One of the goals of this website is to foster constructive dialogue concerning science and science education. Comments not in line with this goal may be deleted.

Our Visitors:

Scientific criticism originates within the scientific literature, not outside of it.
© Jeremy Mohn, 2006