Stand up for REAL science. Critically analyze ALL theories.
Teach the ACTUAL Controversies.
Critically Analyze ALL Theories.
BLOG

Attention: The URL for this blog has changed.
It can now be found here: http://www.anevolvingcreation.net/standup/
REAL Science Blog

REAL Science Home

Contact Webmaster

Link to This Website

RSS Feed


Our YouTube Channel


Read this FREE online!




Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Sooner in Oklahoma

Oklahoma wins the booby prize for having the first "academic freedom" bill filed this year.

From the National Center for Science Education:

Senate Bill 320 (document), prefiled in the Oklahoma Senate and scheduled for a first reading on February 2, 2009, is apparently the first antievolution bill of 2009. Entitled the "Scientific Education and Academic Freedom Act," SB 320 would, if enacted, require state and local educational authorities to "assist teachers to find more effective ways to present the science curriculum where it addresses scientific controversies" and permit teachers to "help students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific theories pertinent to the course being taught." The only topics specifically mentioned as controversial are "biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming, and human cloning."

Once again, the legislation states that students may be evaluated on their comprehension of REAL science, not that they will be held accountable for learning science. In other words, students aren't required to understand REAL science in order to pass because of the presence of the weasel word "may:"

E. Students may be evaluated based upon their understanding of course materials, but no student in any public school or institution shall be penalized in any way because the student may subscribe to a particular position on scientific theories.

Here's a scenario dreaded by science teachers:
"For 5 points, explain the scientific evidence supporting the Big Bang theory."

Student response: "God said BANG; see Genesis."

Wouldn't the student be due full credit for this answer because (a) they're not required to understand the science and (b) they're expressing a religious viewpoint against which we must not discriminate?

The anti-evolutionists in Oklahoma aren't content to wait until the 2009-2010 school year to put this bill into effect should it pass (emphasis added):

SECTION 3. It being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.



posted by Cheryl Shepherd-Adams



<< Home | Everyday Evolution >> | A Fish on Dry Land >> | How REAL Science Works >> | Nature's Darwin 200 Special >> | REAL Science...Video Style >> | IDEAs wanted? >> | "Strengths and Weaknesses" Goes Missing, Again >> | Beyond $hameful, Part II: For the Money >> | Everything's Bigger in Texas. . . >> | Happy Holidays! >>


Archives
December 2007  
January 2008  
February 2008  
March 2008  
April 2008  
May 2008  
June 2008  
July 2008  
August 2008  
September 2008  
October 2008  
November 2008  
December 2008  
January 2009  
February 2009  
March 2009  
April 2009  
May 2009  
June 2009  
July 2009  
August 2009  
September 2009  
October 2009  
November 2009  
December 2009  
January 2010  
February 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Blog Contributors

What is REAL science?




Disclaimer:
The thoughts and opinions expressed on this blog are solely our own. They do not necessarily represent the views of our employers or any other organization with which we are affiliated.

Comment Policy:
One of the goals of this website is to foster constructive dialogue concerning science and science education. Comments not in line with this goal may be deleted.

Our Visitors:

Scientific criticism originates within the scientific literature, not outside of it.
© Jeremy Mohn, 2006