Stand up for REAL science. Critically analyze ALL theories.
Teach the ACTUAL Controversies.
Critically Analyze ALL Theories.
BLOG

Attention: The URL for this blog has changed.
It can now be found here: http://www.anevolvingcreation.net/standup/
REAL Science Blog

REAL Science Home

Contact Webmaster

Link to This Website

RSS Feed


Our YouTube Channel


Read this FREE online!




Thursday, February 19, 2009
Onward, Christian Soldiers

Now there's a hymn I've refused to sing for years. The Methodist Church tried to remove the song from its hymnal in 1986 but failed due to protests from parishioners. The 1990 edition of the Presbyterian hymnal doesn't contain the militaristic song. One might argue that the image of Christian soldiers marching to war with the cross of Jesus going at the fore is just a metaphor for fighting evil, not our fellow man. Still, that song puts me in mind of heavy-handed bullies using the shield of Christianity to run swords through any who dare believe differently.

Dr. Robert T. Pennock, a staunch evolution supporter from Michigan State University, is in rare agreement with the Discovery Institute: ideas have consequences. In a column for the U.S. News & World Report, Pennock bares the violent imagery and actions offered up by the anti-evolution movement.

Philip Johnson, the godfather of the ID movement, described evolutionary biologists as being like Napoleon's army in Moscow, "They have occupied a lot of territory, and they think they've won the war. And yet they are very exposed in a hostile climate with a population that's very much unfriendly," ("The Dick Staub Interview: Philip Johnson," Christianity Today 2002.) Following their loss in the Dover case, ID leader William Dembski wrote that the decision would "galvanize the Christian community"; school boards and state legislators "may tread more cautiously" he said, "but tread on evolution they will-the culture war demands it!" (Dembski, "Preface" to Darwin ' s Nemesis: Philip Johnson and the Intelligent Design Movement.) ID propagandists then put up a new website "Overwhelming Evidence [OE]" aimed at recruiting high school students to the ID movement; it characterizes Judge Jones as an "activist" and "a rogue" and encourages students to "Join the OE Army!" Elsewhere Dembski has written a call to unapologetic apologetics and martyrdom: "[T]his is our calling as Christian apologists, to bear witness to the truth, even to the point of death (be it the death of our bodies or the death of our careers)." To be worthy apologists and to never give in to the ground rules set by the secular academy, Dembski and fellow ID-advocate Jay Wesley Richards wrote, is "perhaps not a martyrdom where we spill our blood (although this too may be required)." (Quoted in Pennock 2006).

The warrior mentality helps the anti-science activists in a number of ways. In rallying the faithful, dehumanizing the opponent, and justifying extreme actions, the possibility for calm, reasoned discourse is jettisoned. Not surprisingly, this rejection of any middle ground is reflected in claims that no Real ChristianTM supports evolution, paralleling the "you're either with us or against us" state of mind.

As Pennock notes, these polemics are pointless:

Darwin shares his birthday with Abraham Lincoln, and the famous conclusion of Lincoln's first Inaugural Address is relevant to the culture war that creationists and other extremists would inject into our children's science classes. Let us forthrightly reject those false and polarizing views and hope that the better angels of our nature will eventually prevail and bring this war to an end.

Jump over to Pennock's column for a chilling dose of an unfortunate reality.



posted by Cheryl Shepherd-Adams



<< Home | Jeffrey Dahmer's Ghost >> | Not Even Wrong >> | Nope, Still A Quote Mine >> | Another One Bites the (Red, Oklahoma) Dust >> | Science Cafe: February >> | The 1000th "Steve:" Darwin! >> | The DI Didn't Get the Memo >> | Yay! I lost a bet! >> | Let's Get This Party Started! >> | "Missing Links in Darwin Day Poll" >>


Archives
December 2007  
January 2008  
February 2008  
March 2008  
April 2008  
May 2008  
June 2008  
July 2008  
August 2008  
September 2008  
October 2008  
November 2008  
December 2008  
January 2009  
February 2009  
March 2009  
April 2009  
May 2009  
June 2009  
July 2009  
August 2009  
September 2009  
October 2009  
November 2009  
December 2009  
January 2010  
February 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Blog Contributors

What is REAL science?




Disclaimer:
The thoughts and opinions expressed on this blog are solely our own. They do not necessarily represent the views of our employers or any other organization with which we are affiliated.

Comment Policy:
One of the goals of this website is to foster constructive dialogue concerning science and science education. Comments not in line with this goal may be deleted.

Our Visitors:

Scientific criticism originates within the scientific literature, not outside of it.
© Jeremy Mohn, 2006