Stand up for REAL science. Critically analyze ALL theories.
Teach the ACTUAL Controversies.
Critically Analyze ALL Theories.
BLOG

Attention: The URL for this blog has changed.
It can now be found here: http://www.anevolvingcreation.net/standup/
REAL Science Blog

REAL Science Home

Contact Webmaster

Link to This Website

RSS Feed


Our YouTube Channel


Read this FREE online!




Saturday, April 25, 2009
More Thoughts Than Hay

John Pieret of "Thoughts in a Haystack" has added his voice to the discussion about whether faith and science can live in harmony.

Referring to one of the complaints against "accomodationism" - namely that it must be ineffective because public opinion has changed little over the decades - Pieret writes:

In my own (admittedly unscientific) view, I suspect that these numbers are stable because they represent some basic way people differ in how they look at the world and attempt to explain it. Be that as it may, focusing on one statistic is a highly suspect way to judge the effect of any program. Look, for example, at another statistic:

According to a 2006 study sponsored by the Faith and Progressive Policy Initiative of the Center for American Progress and conducted by the firm Financial Dynamism ... [e]ighty percent of those questioned agree that "faith and science can and should coexist. We can respect our belief in God and our commitment to the dignity of every human life by using our scientific knowledge to help those who are sick or vulnerable." The same overwhelming number endorses the view that "stem cell research can be a force for moral good rather than a moral failing."

Why should we not attribute this highly encouraging result, at least in significant part, to the "accomodationist" campaign?

In addition, there are also indications that public acceptance of evolution is on the rise. For instance, the latest Gallup poll indicated that younger Americans are significantly more likely to accept evolution than their parents and grandparents.

This difference is likely due to many factors, one of which is the obvious fact that younger people are less likely to be religious. But I think it's also possible that public outreach efforts by organizations like NAS, AAAS, and NCSE may have something to do with it, especially since the fruits of their efforts are probably encountered most frequently by students and teachers in science classroom settings.

Anyway, I'm starting to feel pretty lucky. I keep finding intriguing thoughts instead of hay when I search through the haystack.

I think John must be stacking the stack.



posted by Jeremy Mohn



<< Home | Pea-ooh-yee-la!!! >> | Faith-Science Harmony: A Guide for the Tone Deaf >> | Doin' REAL Science . . . >> | Stirring Up a Hornet's Nest >> | "Tree of Life" >> | An Evolving Creationism >> | "I Love Jesus and I Accept Evolution!" >> | Sham Artists >> | Bad Science, Horrific Consequences >> | What is Evo-Devo? >>


Archives
December 2007  
January 2008  
February 2008  
March 2008  
April 2008  
May 2008  
June 2008  
July 2008  
August 2008  
September 2008  
October 2008  
November 2008  
December 2008  
January 2009  
February 2009  
March 2009  
April 2009  
May 2009  
June 2009  
July 2009  
August 2009  
September 2009  
October 2009  
November 2009  
December 2009  
January 2010  
February 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Blog Contributors

What is REAL science?




Disclaimer:
The thoughts and opinions expressed on this blog are solely our own. They do not necessarily represent the views of our employers or any other organization with which we are affiliated.

Comment Policy:
One of the goals of this website is to foster constructive dialogue concerning science and science education. Comments not in line with this goal may be deleted.

Our Visitors:

Scientific criticism originates within the scientific literature, not outside of it.
© Jeremy Mohn, 2006