The case of John Freshwater has been discussed extensively in the blogosphere. Steve Goble, of the Mansfield (OH) News-Journal, cuts through the hysterical cries of "Freshwater's being persecuted because he's a Christian" and reminds us of a few salient points: that Freshwater burned a cross into a student's arm and that his science teaching was questionable at best.
My husband has fond memories of living in Mansfield during part of his childhood. It's a gorgeous town with oodles of hills and trees, plenty of storm sewers for kids to play in(!), and a lush botanical garden. When he was 8, my husband had set up a small telescope on the deck in the backyard and was teaching the neighborhood kids about the stars. He headed up a biker's gang, one that patrolled the streets carrying first-aid kits to help kids who'd wiped out on their bicycles. To this day, he speaks highly of the gifted-talented program in the Mansfield schools during that era. All in all, it sounds like Mansfield was a good place to be a high-energy kid.
Down the road in Mt. Vernon, in the domain of John Freshwater? Not so much, it seems. The community seems to be beset with teachers who've confused their classrooms for chapels, and the fact that it's taken years for Freshwater to face any consequences for his actions doesn't speak well for the school or district administration. Perhaps those administrators feared rocking the boat, or maybe they were complicit in Freshwater's mission. Either way, a generation of students has been taught that evolution is a lie, that creationism is valid science, and that it's laudable for a public school teacher to push his beliefs on his captive audience in a perverted sense of "academic freedom."
Steve Goble reminds us what academic freedom really means, with added bolding:
If there actually was a scientific case to be made for creationism, the academic freedom argument would work. But there isn't such a case, and so the academic freedom argument fails.
Here's an academic freedom argument that does make sense: Proponents of creationism and intelligent design have the academic freedom to assemble a legitimate scientific case. They've always had that freedom, and haven't made a case yet, but they're welcome to try.
Freshwater's supporters try to cloud the issue by distracting us with irrelevancies. Keep in mind that this is not about academic freedom. It's not about a Bible on a desk. It's about a public school teacher robbing parents of the right to decide how their children will be brought up religiously. It's about a public school teacher physically abusing the kids he's supposed to be protecting.
It's about a so-called teacher flouting REAL science to proselytize the kids under his care.












posted by Cheryl Shepherd-Adams