As readers of this blog are probably well aware, the Discovery Institute has recently launched a nationwide effort to promote “Academic Freedom” statutes in state legislatures (please note my intentional use of quotation marks).
Supporters of these statutes argue that teachers should be legally entitled to present the “full range of scientific views” regarding chemical and biological evolution.
State Legislatures in Florida, Missouri, Alabama, Michigan, and South Carolina all considered (but failed to pass) “Academic Freedom” legislation in 2008. The Louisiana Legislature adopted such a measure last summer. It is quite possible that other states will consider such statutes in 2009.
Unfortunately, like another popular concept the DI has recently seized upon, they seem to be using their own definition for “academic freedom.”
In an upcoming book from Yale University Press, authors Matthew W. Finkin and Robert C. Post carefully distinguish academic freedom from the kind of individual free speech right that is created by the First Amendment.
Here is the publisher’s description of the book:
Sounds like an interesting and informative book.
Maybe someone should send a copy to the DI.

Posted by Jeremy Mohn


The currently popular catch-phrases like “academic freedom” and “critical analysis” are merely shells that have been erected to hide the ID movement’s true nature.